Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2, 2009, Defendant A violated the Act on the Regulation and Punishment of Criminal Proceeds Concealment by the Defendants: (a) around 20:53 on August 2, 2009, in the game room in which the Defendant was working as an employee on the second floor of the Kucheon-si building E-gu, Seocheon-si; (b) as a result of the Defendant’s control over speculative business from the Seocheon F District, he was placed in the game room, and (c) the Defendant B attempted to deliver KRW 3,493,00 of the cash, which was operating income in the Kacra game machine installed in the said game room, to Defendant B, and (d) concealed the said cash by means of inserting it into his own bank as if it was one’s money. However, the said cash was discovered to

As a result, the Defendants conspired to conceal the above cash, which is the criminal proceeds, but did not commit it but did not commit an attempted crime.

2. At around 15:30 on April 17, 2012, Defendant A’s perjury attended and took an oath as a witness of the Defendant’s case in violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry with Support of Busan District Court Decision 2011 High Court Decision 201Da18555, Defendant A responded to the prosecutor’s question “I and the Defendant were aware of the relationship between the Defendant and the owner of the game room business,” and answer to the prosecutor’s question “I and the Defendant first appeared in the game room on that day.”

However, B was aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the fact that H had been engaged in telephone conversations between H and 37 times from May 20, 2009 to August 2, 2009, where H had operated the game room business in paragraph (1). B had been engaged in a game room even before the game room was controlled as provided in paragraph (1).

Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement contrary to memory as above and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning H;

1. Protocol of examination of witness (H and A) of 201 high-level 18555 for each side support;

1. Seizure records;

1.I.D.