beta
Text
1. The defendant shall pay 91,00,000 won to the plaintiff and 15% per annum from September 9, 2016 to the day of complete payment.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On July 22, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant drafted a contract for supply and supply of the following content to the three-strings produced and sold by the Plaintiff:
(hereinafter referred to as the “instant contract”). Article 1 (In the case of this case, KRW 910 million (Additional Tax 91 million) of the total amount of KRW 910 million (Additional Tax 91 million), KRW 200 million (Additional Tax 20 million), KRW 1,500, KRW 4500, KRW 2500 (Additional Tax 250,000), KRW 1,500, KRW 1800, KRW 4550,000 (Additional Tax 25,500,000), Article 2 (Additional Tax 45,500,000 won) of the Settlement Method (Additional Tax 45,000,000 won) and KRW 2 (65,000,000, KRW 100,000) and KRW 50,000 (30,000,000,000) are scheduled to be paid (hereinafter referred to as “The Settlement Method”).
1. By November 11, 2015, the Plaintiff should supply goods under a contract at a place designated by the Defendant.
Article 5 (Compensation for Damages) If the Defendant has delivered the goods in violation of this Agreement, the down payment shall be reverted to the Plaintiff as penalty. After the delivery, the down payment that the Defendant deposited to the Plaintiff shall be deemed to have been abandoned, and the Plaintiff shall be paid the fees, other damages, taxes and public charges until the time of the return of the goods, and damages equivalent to the overdue amount and interest thereof from the delivery date, and the Plaintiff shall be paid in consultation with the Defendant
B. On January 25, 2016, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff a letter of public notice on the termination of the contract to the effect that “I would purchase the regratory type equipment upon the completion of the relocation of the factory of the closed death, even if the contract was terminated due to the inevitable circumstances of the closed death, and at the time of the extension of new equipment.”
On February 17, 2016, the plaintiff suffered enormous losses, such as unnecessary payments and loss of work process, due to the termination of a sudden contract, the three of the contract ex officio is under way.