1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from June 28, 2016 to August 22, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From 2011 to February 2014, the Plaintiff served as the head of the office at the Seoyang-gun C Secretariat, and served as the head of the D office from March 1, 2014.

B. There was a conflict of opinion between the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism and D (Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism) and the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, which are affiliated organizations and independent organizations.

C. On October 15, 2015, the Committee decided to dismiss the Plaintiff and notified the Plaintiff.

The reason for dismissal was "not stating the details of revenue in the Committee without reporting to the Chairperson, without preparing the expenditure resolution, failing to prepare the revenue resolution, failing to report to the Chairperson."

On October 15, 2015, the Committee sent an official door to request the Syang-gun to take measures accordingly, because it dismissed the plaintiff.

On October 28, 2015, the head of Seoyang-gu notified the D Council of the cancellation of the agreement on the employment support for the head of the office for rural experience and recreation village (the agreement entered into between the plaintiff and the head of Seoyang-gu and D that the head of Seoyang-gu pay the expenses to the plaintiff as the subsidy).

E. On September 21, 2016, the public prosecutor of the Gwangju District Public Prosecutor’s Office (No. 2016 type No. 49017 of the Gwangju District Public Prosecutor’s Office) ordered the Defendant to defamation, abuse of authority, and obstruction of another’s exercise of one’s right (Article 2016 type No. 49017) on December 22, 2016.

Therefore, although the plaintiff filed an appeal (2017 high-level high-level public prosecutor's office 2017 high-level public prosecutor's office) and the plaintiff filed an application for adjudication (2017 high-level high-level court 293) but the application for adjudication was dismissed on September 15, 2017.

F. On August 3, 2016, the public prosecutor of the Gwangju District Public Prosecutor’s Office rendered a disposition that was suspected of having committed occupational embezzlement and occupational breach of trust (No. 7265 of the Gwangju District Public Prosecutor’s Office) against the Plaintiff (No. 7265 of the Gwangju District Public Prosecutor’s Office).

G. On December 21, 2015, the Plaintiff is presumed to be a clinical presumption of mixed anxiety and depression disorder, which began from May 201 to around December 21, 2015.