1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,000,000 as well as annual 5% from December 1, 2013 to March 24, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

According to the purport of Gap's evidence and the whole argument, it is acknowledged that Eul has a judicial compromise, including the content that "C and the defendant are divorced, and the defendant shall pay 30 million won to the plaintiff (the defendant and his/her father) up to November 31, 2013" between C and the defendant on October 17, 2013, which is brought against the defendant of the parties to the division of property (this court No. 2013ddan942), and that "the plaintiff shall pay 30 million won to the plaintiff (the defendant and his/her father) by the delivery of a copy of the complaint in this case, and that the plaintiff has expressed his/her intent to return to the defendant by the delivery of a copy of the complaint in this case. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff at the rate of 5% per annum from the day following the due date stipulated in the above settlement to March 24, 2014, which is the delivery date of the complaint in this case, and damages for delay from the day after the day of payment.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is justified and accepted.