(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.20 2015가단197299

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.20 2015가단197299

손해배상

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a financial investment company that runs an investment brokerage business, etc., the Plaintiff entered into a trust account management contract with the Defendant, and the Plaintiff is a person designated as a trustee of the Plaintiff’s trust account (Account Number: Account Number C; hereinafter “instant trust account”) as the Defendant’s employee.

B. The details of stock trading in the instant account, which the Plaintiff is at issue in the cause of the instant claim, are as follows.

The Plaintiff initially claimed damages related to the stock transaction in AfricaV, but this part of the claim was withdrawn on the fourth date for pleading.

1) The average purchase price: 154,500 won: (2) the total purchase price: 46,350,000 won; and (1) the average purchase price: 33,600 won; (2) the total purchase price: 33,600 won; (33,600,000 won; 2) the total purchase price; (1) the average sale price: 300 shares of Hyundai Motor on August 21, 2015; (2) the total sale price: 147,00 won: 4,100,000 won; (3) the total sale price; and (4),10,000 won; and (1) the purport of the entire pleading:

2. On July 29, 2015, B, the administrator of the instant consignment account, as the Plaintiff’s employee, was the Plaintiff’s assertion that: (a) on the part of July 29, 2015, the Plaintiff, despite having expressed his intention to refuse to purchase, was fluently harsh to the effect that the share price would rise; (b) caused damages equivalent to the share price decline to the Plaintiff by having the Plaintiff purchase the said shares 1,000 shares; and (c) on September 11, 2015, even if the Plaintiff requested to sell the CJ shares on September 11, 205, the share price was not recovered on the day; (b) did not inform the Plaintiff of the change in the situation where the share price continuously drop, and neglected it to cause damages equivalent to the share price decline to the Plaintiff; and (c) on the grounds of uncertainty that North Korea could spread on August 21, 2015, the Plaintiff sold the said shares to the Plaintiff by selling it against the Plaintiff’s intent

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2017.05.25 2017고정380

-서울남부지방법원 2018.06.08 2017고단3239 (1)

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.2.19. 선고 2013고합1408 판결

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.5.2. 선고 2013고합1380 판결

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.10.01 2013고단4917