logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.29 2015고단4462
업무상배임
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From September 1, 2006 to August 25, 2014, the Defendant served as the head of the Victim E, and had been in charge of the business of preparing, submitting, etc. proposals and submission of the victim company related to the contract acceptance, and the Defendant had been in charge of the business affairs of the victim company, who had been in charge of the business affairs of the victim company related to the contract receipt. On the wind that the Defendant would make the victim escape from the company as soon as possible, the Defendant was in charge of the business affairs of the victim company until his successor is in physical inspection even after retirement

On the other hand, on August 8, 2014, prior to retirement, the Defendant received a request from F employee G in charge of F Co., Ltd. for a proposal for the order of the installation, maintenance, and repair service of the computers that the FF manufactured and sold, and then sent the victim company's letter of introduction and price check by e-mail on August 20, 2014, and then received a request from F Co., Ltd. G in charge of F to visit the above service tender on August 26, 2014.

Therefore, even though there was a duty to faithfully prepare and submit a bid proposal to enable the victim company to receive the service contract ordered by the above FF, the defendant was to join the victim company around July 2014 with the victim company and to retire from the victim company. However, the victim company's persons related to the victim company was hiding such fact into the victim company's company, and did not at all state the fact that the victim company was requested to participate in the service contract, and the above H did not prepare the victim company's price proposal at will, even if the defendant did not receive any request for the bid from F, even though the defendant did not receive any request for the bid from F, it also prepared the price proposal under the above H's name and the price proposal under the above H's name on September 16, 2014, and the above proposal was a better condition.

This is the defendant.

arrow