1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant Aunet Co., Ltd.: 2,984,728,398 won and 1,205,904,119 won among them.

1. Request to Defendant Anet Company, A, B, or D;

(a) Description of claims: To describe the cause of claims and the changed cause of claims as shown in the annex;

(b) Grounds for recognition (1) Defendant A, A, B: Judgment by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 208(2) of the Civil Procedure Act). (2) Defendant A, A: A, and D: A judgment of deemed confession based on the submission of a written reply (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act). 2. Claim against Defendant C and E

A. In full view of the overall purport of the arguments as to the grounds for the claim Gap's evidence Nos. 1 to 8, the defendants are jointly and severally liable with the defendant Ainet Co., Ltd. to pay the amount stated in Paragraph 2 of the Disposition.

B. (1) As to the claim of Defendant C and E, Defendant C asserted that the claim against Defendant C is unjustifiable since it should have been dismissed from the general partner after the retirement on December 24, 2003, since Defendant C entered the limited partnershipF on June 24, 1989 and resigned on December 24, 2003, and became a general partner with unlimited liability during the above service period.

In December 24, 2003, Defendant C retired from the limited partnershipF on December 24, 2003.

There is no evidence to prove that Defendant C has been dismissed from office as a general partner or as a general partner, and further, as long as Defendant C has been registered as a general partner of Limited PartnershipF in the corporate register of Limited PartnershipF as a general partner of Limited PartnershipF, it is difficult to view the status as a general partner until Defendant C has registered for dismissal, and otherwise, Defendant C has no evidence to prove

Therefore, Defendant C’s assertion is without merit.

(2) Defendant E’s assertion (A) asserts that Defendant E retired from office as an executive officer of a limited partnership company F on April 2006 and lost the position of the unlimited partner.

Defendant E is the general partner of the limited partnership company F in the corporate register of the limited partnership company F.