logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2013.11.14 2013고단868
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 8, 2013, at around 23:00 on March 23:1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim’s DNA store operated by the victim C, who is located in the Glour-gun B, with a large voice that “Is the drinking value;” and (b) caused the victim’s disturbance by destroying the table and entrance in an amount equivalent to a total of 400,000 won, the market value of the victim’s possession, thereby preventing customers from entering the scene, and making it impossible for customers to enter the scene of approximately 30 minutes.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the business of the victim's bar business by force and damaged the victim's property.

2. The obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant: (a) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1); and (b) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), the victim F (31) who is the police box belonging to the Gldong Police Station E box called by the Defendant after receiving a report that the Defendant did not pay the drinking value and controlled him/her; and (c) the Victim F (31) who was the police box belonging to the Gldong Police Station E box called “I am superior to the Defendant, son, franch, franch, franch, to whom I want to die; franch franch, I want to have been returned; franch, I am the victim’s face over several occasions; and (d) the victim’s continued met, “I am franch, franch, franch,” assaulted the victim’s left part part of the box and franch the victim’s face at the right time.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of the 112 Report Report Report case, and at the same time, the Defendant was sprinked with a face-to-face care for the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of G or H;

1. Statement of police statement related to F and C;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of written estimates and receipt statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act for the crime concerned, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 314(1) and 313 of the Criminal Act, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act for the crime;

1.Article 40 of the Criminal Code of Trade and Trade.

arrow