logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2013.08.09 2013고합98
일반건조물방화
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was working for one-time painting in the “E” household factory of the “E” household in Pakistan.

At around 01:30 on May 20, 2013, the Defendant added a fire to the entire building of 60 square meters in the floor area of a non-breadth block structure, by turning a stringer, which was in possession of a string to the right angle, on the ground that D, in the above plant, disregards the defendant in a flat and works as a daily worker only when the company needs to do so, but the defendant works as a daily worker.

Accordingly, the defendant, who is the victim D, destroyed all of the factory buildings in an amount equivalent to KRW 182.5 million at the market price of the victim D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the items damaged by the victim, investigation reports, investigation reports (a summary of statement), and reports on criminal investigations (Repayment of the facts of damage and confirmation of the intention of punishment

1. The crime of this case for the reason of sentencing under Article 166 (1) of the Criminal Code of the relevant criminal facts is committed in consideration of the following favorable circumstances: (a) the crime of this case was committed by the defendant intentionally setting fire to the factory of the victim who was his work, and the quality of the crime was extremely poor; (b) the crime of this case resulted in serious economic damage to the victim; (c) however, the victim was not compensated for the victim at all; (d) the victim did not have the same criminal records; and (e) the defendant did not have the same criminal records; and (e) the fact that the defendant repented and reflecteds his mistake late and is against it.

arrow