The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and the purport of the appeal are the judgment of the first instance.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relationship between the parties (1) Defendant E was faced with financial difficulties while operating a furniture manufacturing business at a factory in Yangju-si (hereinafter “instant factory”).

Accordingly, the Plaintiff, having relationship with Defendant E, provided financial support to Defendant E, and employed Defendant B, C, and D (hereinafter “Defendant B, etc.”) including Defendant E from March 5, 2014, and operated the furniture manufacturing business in the instant plant with the trade name of “I”.

(2) Defendant F is the representative of J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “J”), and Defendant G is Defendant F’s children.

(3) Upon receiving the order from J, the Plaintiff produced and supplied the furniture in the instant plant, and the J supplied the supplied furniture to K (hereinafter “K”).

B. The Plaintiff’s discontinuance of business (1) Defendant B, etc. worked as the Plaintiff’s employee and served as the J from June 2, 2015.

(2) On July 31, 2015, the Plaintiff discontinued the business of “I”, corrected the entrance door of the instant plant with locks, and sent text messages to Defendant B, etc. that were dismissed.

(c)

around 08:00 on August 1, 2015, Defendant B, etc. cut the locks of the factory entrance of this case and entered the factory. On August 19, 2015, each of the factories of this case was removed from the factory of this case on August 29, 2015, August 29, 2015; on September 5, 2015 to September 9, 2015, Defendant B, etc. supplied parts to the branch office of K U.S. river, the branch office of Yongsan Station, the branch office of Yongsan Station, and the branch office of school Dong (hereinafter “the household finished products supplied as above”). (2) The Plaintiff filed a complaint with an investigative agency against Defendant B, etc. for special larceny of finished products of the household of this case, but the investigative agency was not guilty.

(d)

(1) As a result of the relevant case, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim) against J on September 30, 2015, pursuant to the order of J, from June 26, 2015 to July 31, 2015, 2015.