beta
Text
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months;
2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
except that this shall not apply.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2013 Highest 6860]
1. On January 27, 2011, the Defendant prepared a cash custody certificate in the name of F, which is the husband of the Defendant, and forged a cash custody certificate in the name of F, which is a private document related to the certification of fact, with the purpose of using the computer at the residence of 202 of the building E, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Seoul: G, and the address: 202 of the building E: Suwon-gu, Suwon-do, and the above principal borrowed a cash custody amount (20,00,000) on January 27, 2011. This amount is to be repaid one month after the promise to pay, and written a cash custody certificate in the name of F, which is the document related to the certification of fact, with the intention of using the seal affixed to F, and thereafter, I authentic the residence of H apartment 355, 85, Dong-gu, Suwon-si.
In addition, from that time to February 20, 2012, the Defendant forged 52 copies of the cash storage certificate in F and 22 persons, a private document pertaining to the certificate of fact, for the purpose of exercising 52 times through the aforementioned method, as shown in the attached list of crimes (1). Around that time, the Defendant issued it to I and exercised it.
2. On October 21, 201, the Defendant: (a) around October 21, 201, at the victim I’s residence in Suwon-si, Suwon-gu H apartment 355 Dong 805, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, the Defendant borrowed money from the Defendant via the Defendant, “I will guarantee the above borrowed money if I lend it to the Defendant that I need to settle the settlement.” (b) The Defendant borrowed money from the employees of the said company.
However, the Defendant, at the time, intended to borrow money in order to prevent the victim from returning the money borrowed from the victim, and after receiving the money, he/she would have borrowed five million won to the victim and paid 600,000 won to the victim.