beta
Text
Defendant
A, C, and E Fines 300,000, Defendant B shall be punished by fine 2,00,000, Defendant D shall be punished by fine 50,000, and Defendant F.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the chairperson of the council of occupants' representatives, Defendant B is the chairperson of the committee of emergency countermeasures against the apartment of this case, and Defendant F is the vice chairperson of the committee of emergency countermeasures against the apartment of this case, Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E are the members of the committee of emergency countermeasures against the apartment of this case.
The Defendants were issued a summary order of KRW 1 million due to the violation of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Residential Environments by the victim J, the head of the association of the instant apartment reconstruction improvement project association, and the summary order became final and conclusive, and were retired from the office of the president of the association under the said Act, but still became more serious for the reason that they still are in charge of the affairs of the said association with the victim K.
1. Defendant F, Defendant B, and Defendant D, on February 2015, informed the members of the union of the error of the pertinent union members, such as the victim J and the victim K, in accordance with the proposal of Defendant B, at the office of the Emergency Countermeasure Committee for Cooperatives L in Busan Metropolitan City, Busan Metropolitan City.
Resolution was adopted.
On the 16th day of the same month, the Defendants conspired to distribute to the members of the said association the document of “the illegality of the association recognized by the reconstruction emergency countermeasure committee” prepared by Defendant B by referring to the victim J and the victim K in accordance with the above resolution.
The Defendants printed out 70-80 copies of the above document using computers and flickers, and Defendant D distributed the above document to 30-40 apartment residents by sending the above document to 40 members of the above association. Defendant B attached one copy on the front stairs wall of the apartment B 101, the apartment house B of this case.
The above document does not notify the victim K and the victim J of any union member, and is worth KRW 384,140,000 from the date of construction interest.