beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Basic Facts
The related defendant operates C, which is an individual company that manufactures fruit materials, such as iron lines, and the non-party D is a person who works as a regular business in C (the defendant and C, hereinafter referred to as "the defendant, and hereinafter referred to as "the defendant") from October 2010 to November 2012 and has been engaged in the business of purchase, supply, business, etc., and the plaintiff is a wife of D.
The Seoul Metal Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Seoul Metal”) is a major trading office of the Defendant, as the manufacturer of electronic parts and V or set, and Nonparty E is a person who has worked in Seoul Metal from September 2010 to November 2012.
D’s embezzlement, fraud D, and E sold surplus materials supplied by the Defendant, etc. voluntarily, after the Seoul Metal sold them to divide the proceeds therefrom. From January 201 to August 23, 2012, Seoul Metal arbitrarily sold approximately KRW 338 tons of the supply value of the Seoul Metal owned by the Defendant, etc. from January 201 to August 23, 201, and embezzled them (hereinafter “instant embezzlement”).
D In collusion with E, the Seoul Metal was actually supplied by the Defendant from January 18, 201 to July 23, 2012.
Along with the fact that no longer than a number of fruit materials were supplied or supplied, a pre-mark was prepared as if they were supplied, and the Seoul Metal made a total of KRW 729,225,340 to the Defendant in accordance with the false pre-mark.
(hereinafter referred to as “the instant fraud”. D and E agree with the Plaintiff to manage passbooks (Account Number: F) in the name of the Plaintiff, and in fact, the Plaintiff did not have any connection with the delivery of the said Seoul Metal, and even though there was no relationship with the Plaintiff’s raw material supplier, from January 18, 201 to July 23, 2012, some of the surplus materials supplied to the Defendant to the Defendant “Seoul Metal” was directly supplied to the Seoul Metal, and thus, the payment of excess materials was made from Seoul Metal.