beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
(a) Defendant A’s KRW 115,482,810 and its related thereto from March 15, 2018:
B. Defendant A, C, and D are the same.
Reasons
Facts of recognition
Defendant A served as the head of the corporate support headquarters or the head of the headquarters of the F Federation (hereinafter “F”) from September 24, 2013 to December 31, 2016, and the F was in charge of the management and enforcement of subsidies received from the Plaintiff, etc.
Defendant B served as the F’s corporate support team leader or the head of the company support planning division from April 2013 to December 2016, 2016, and Defendant D served as the F’s corporate support team leader or the head of the company support group, etc. from January 2013 to December 2016, and each Defendant A was in charge of executing F’s subsidies under the direction of each Defendant A.
Defendant C served as the Secretary General of F from September 5, 2012 to December 12, 2014, and has overall control over F’s operation and fund enforcement.
Defendant E served as the Secretary General of F from December 15, 2014 to November 2, 2015, and as F’s liquidator from November 11, 2015 to August 1, 2016, respectively, and took overall charge of F’s operation and fund enforcement affairs.
Defendant A and E were indicted on the facts that each embezzlement of the Defendants’ F against the Defendants’ respective embezzlement and embezzlement of F funds of the same item as indicated below [Attachment 1], and on February 9, 2018, Defendant E was sentenced to imprisonment for two years in relation to the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) at the Suwon District Court, and Defendant A was sentenced to three years in prison (Usu District Court 2017 High Court 2017 High Court 624, 2018 High Court 2018 High Court 201Mo444).
(Seoul High Court 2018No880). On September 6, 2018, the above appellate court accepted the appeal on the part of the offering of a bribe to Defendant A, and sentenced Defendant A to three years of imprisonment, and dismissed each appeal to Defendant E.
The above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
Embezzlement 116,650, 295.