A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 22, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million by the Seoul Central District Court due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On February 4, 2020, the Defendant driven BMW car at around 02:45, while driving the BMW car on the front of Gangnam-gu Seoul.

피고인은 위 교통사고에 관한 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 강남경찰서 D파출소 소속 순경 E로부터 피고인에게서 술 냄새가 심하게 나고, 눈이 빨갛게 충혈되어있고, 혀가 꼬이는 등 피고인이 술에 취한 상태에서 운전을 하였다고 의심할 만한 사유가 있어 호흡측정에 의한 음주측정을 요구받았다.

피고인은 같은 날 03:04경부터 같은 날 03:26경까지 약 22분 동안 4차례에 걸쳐 경찰관으로부터 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았으나 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 시늉을 하는 방법으로 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정 요구에 응하지 않았다.

As a result, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving or the prohibition of refusal to measure drinking more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation reports and notification of the control of the results of drinking driving;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports and investigation status (suspects' previous records and confirmations) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1), 44 (2) and (1) of the Road Traffic Act that choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is highly necessary to eradicate the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, and the defendant again conducted a motor vehicle accident while driving a drinking motor vehicle even though he/she had a history of punishment for drinking driving (2004, 2013). The defendant recently refused a police officer's legitimate demand for measurement of drinking alcohol.