1. On March 4, 2015, the assignment of claims concluded between the Defendant and B shall be revoked.

Basic Facts

On August 12, 2015, the head of the Seocho District Tax Office under the Plaintiff’s jurisdiction imposed and notified the global income tax on B in the year of 2010-2014 on August 12, 2015. As of May 3, 2016, the Plaintiff’s failure to pay the global income tax, as indicated in the following table (hereinafter “instant global income tax”) totaling KRW 4,922,147,960 was delinquent.

(B) On December 31, 2010, 2015.31 December 31, 2015, 2010, the Seocho-gu 203.31, 2015.31, 206.31, 2015.31, 206.31, 207.31, 205.31, 207, 201.31, 207, 2015.31, 30, 2015.3, 204, 30, 201, 201, 30, 205, 204, 205, 204, 30, 2015, 204, 305, 31, 2015, 204, 2015, 305, 2015, 2015, 304, 2015, 2015, 315, 2014.3

B around March 4, 2015, around March 4, 2015, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Defendant, the husband, to transfer the claim for the return of the lease deposit of this case, such as the attached list, to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant transfer contract”). On the same day, the Defendant entered into a new contract with C on July 17, 2014, by changing the lessee to the Defendant and changing the lessee to the Defendant with the same content as the above lease contract.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 6, and claims protected by the obligee's right of revocation of the existence or absence of preserved claims can be viewed as a fraudulent act in principle.