1. The sales contract concluded on September 21, 2015 between the Defendant and B on the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 list between the Defendant and B is 136.

The Defendant did not pay global income tax and value-added tax for the year 2013 to 2015 as follows. Accordingly, the Plaintiff was holding a total of KRW 1,371,081,370 (hereinafter “instant tax claim”).

2. On July 3, 2017, 2013: (a) 12, 344, 9201, 381, 600, 205, 203. 1. 36. 1, 205, 206. 3. 1. 1, 205, 206. 3. 1, 205, 205, 16. 3. 3. 1, 206, 205, 16. 3. 3. 1, 205, 205, 205, 16. 3. 3. 1, 205, 205, 16. 3. 1, 205, 205, 2015. 3. 3. 1, 2015, 2016. 3. 3. 1, 2015

At the time of the instant sales contract, B had been in excess of liability due to positive and negative property, such as attached Table 2 “B”.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 3 through 8, 10 (including partial defense number), and the whole purport of the pleading is that the existence of preserved claims can be protected by the obligee's right of revocation, in principle, prior to the occurrence of a fraudulent act. However, at the time of the fraudulent act, the legal relationship is already based on which the claim was established.