1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 321,973,924 with respect to the Plaintiff, and the period from November 7, 2013 to January 15, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 4, 2011, the Plaintiff: (a) design and a package deal tender for construction works for the facilities for the Water Quality Restoration Center in Gwangju-nam Innovation City; and (b) design and construction works for the construction works for the facilities for the Gwangju-nam Innovation City Water Quality Restoration Center in order to prevent water pollution and recycle sewage treatment water, which are generated at the time of creating the Gwangju-Seoul-Seoul Innovation City (hereinafter “instant tender”).

(2) The instant tender consists of the following stages: “Determination of successful bidders (person eligible for basic design) who are eligible to participate in the preliminary examination of qualifications for participation in the tender notice,” and “determination of successful bidders (person eligible for basic design).”

3) The indication of “stock company” is omitted from the time when the second referring to Copia Global Stock Company (hereinafter “Copia”).

(4) On May 26, 201, the Plaintiff made a second public announcement of the instant tender on May 26, 201, by organizing a joint supply and demand company with SP Construction Co., Ltd., Gold Industry Development Co., Ltd., and filed an application for prior examination on the instant tender, but no other applicant was found.

Around May 201, the Culul Global and Defendant Sulco Construction Co., Ltd. agreed that Defendant Sulco Construction will participate in the bid of this case so that the Cululco Global can be awarded a successful bid.

5) The tender of this case, which was re-published, was selected as an eligible person by the Joint Supply and Demand Agency of Copied for prior examination by filing an application for prior examination, and the construction of Copi was also selected as an eligible person for prior examination by organizing a joint supply and demand organization with the Defendant Spanco Engineering Co., Ltd. (formerly changed Co., Ltd.) and a joint supply and demand organization with the Ulsan Construction Co., Ltd. (former). 6) The Plaintiff held a design review and assessment meeting with respect to the basic design documents submitted by the joint supply and demand organization and the Defendant Spanco Construction Co., Ltd., on September 8, 201, and 79 design points at the Defendant Spanco Construction Co., Ltd.