1. The defendant has completed the acquisition by prescription on January 1, 1985 with respect to each land listed in the separate sheet to the plaintiff.

1. Although the possession of the property devolving upon the cause of the claim under the Act on Special Measures for the Disposal of Property Belonging to the State is deemed to fall under the possession of the property devolving upon the nature of the title, Article 2 subparagraph 1 of the former Act on Special Measures for the Disposal of Property Belonging to the State and Article 5 of the Addenda of the former Act stipulate that the property devolving upon the State, which was not concluded by the end of December 1, 1964, shall be free of charge and free of charge, the property devolving upon the cause of the claim, which

Therefore, from January 1, 1965, the possession of the land was returned to the possession with the intention of possession with the intention of possession, in case where the land was purchased and possessed as the property devolving upon the State.

Therefore, it is possible to proceed with the acquisition by prescription from that time.

(2) In order to use each of the lands listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the lands of this case”) as reservoir sites for B projects commenced from November 27, 194 to November 27, 194, at the time of purchase from Nonparty C, the owner on the registry, who owned the land of this case, and thereafter possessed it around March 25, 1959. After completion of B projects on March 31, 1954, A association acquired the confirmation from the upper Do governor around March 25, 1959. A association was incorporated into the Repair Association on December 13, 1961, and acquired the ownership transfer registration for each of the lands of this case on December 16, 200 through consolidation and change of names, and thus, it can be recognized that the Defendant acquired the ownership transfer registration for each of the lands of this case from March 15, 201 to December 16, 198.