logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2011. 8. 19. 선고 2010누43015 판결
[재임용거부처분취소결정취소][미간행]
Plaintiff and appellant

Korea Educational Institute (Law Firm Gyeong, Attorney Kim Young-chul, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, Appellant

Teachers' Appeals Review Committee (Law Firm, Attorneys Park Gam-young, Counsel for defendant-appellant)

Intervenor joining the Defendant

Defendant 1 and 3 others

Conclusion of Pleadings

June 17, 2011

The first instance judgment

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2010Guhap29376 decided November 5, 2010

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the costs of supplementary participation, are borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance court is revoked. The revocation decision made by the Defendant on April 5, 2010 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s Intervenor 1, 2010-028, 2010-040 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s Intervenor 2, 2010-040 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s Intervenor 3, 2010-044 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s Intervenor 4, and 2010-052 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s Intervenor 4

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this Court shall accept it in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Gangnam-gu (Presiding Judge)

arrow