1. All of the plaintiffs' lawsuits of this case are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. Plaintiff A was in the third year of Cmiddle School around 2018; Plaintiff B was the mother of Plaintiff A.

(hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiffs,” unless it is particularly necessary to distinguish them. (b)

The Plaintiffs reported to the Defendant at the beginning of around 2018, that the Plaintiff was subject to school violence such as “disposition” and “Information” listed in the list of Plaintiff A (attached Form 1) (attached Form 2) (including the content of school violence claimed by the Plaintiffs).

C. On October 17, 2018, the Cmiddle School Violence Countermeasures Autonomy Committee held a meeting of the autonomous committee and deliberated on the said reported agenda, and all of them decided to “not school violence.”

Accordingly, on October 24, 2018, the Defendant rendered a disposition to the Plaintiffs, including graduates D, students E, I, and third-year broadcast interview participants, participants in the third-year program, participants in the third-year program, participants in the third-year program, and participants in the third-year program (attached Form 1) regarding all the activities of the persons subject to the list in accordance with the results of the meeting of the autonomous committee on October 17, 2018 (hereinafter “each disposition of this case”), and notified all the activities of all the persons subject to the list, including parents, and teachers, as “school violence” (attached Form 2).

(hereinafter “each of the instant notifications”). [Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the parties’ assertion

A. Although both the plaintiffs (attached Form 1) and 2 (attached Form 2) exercised school violence against the plaintiff, the defendant issued a disposition that "it is not school violence" against the plaintiff, and the defendant's disposition that "it is not school violence" against each of the above defendants should be revoked as it misleads the fact and is unlawful.

On the other hand, although the plaintiff A graduated from the C Middle School, the exercise of the right to take measures against the school violence perpetrator does not have any provision on the exclusion period or statute of limitations, and the aggressor student is a higher school.