The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a large boom.

On July 14, 2014, around 14:20, the Defendant was obliged to pay due care to the surrounding traffic conditions to the area where it is impossible to make a U-turn and left-hand turn due to the frequent passage of the vehicle on the first line national highways of the Do road in front of the dwelling area C, if the light railer on the right side of the road of the Do in front of the dwelling area in Seodaemun-si, was cross across the central line on the Do road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant suffered from the negligence of crossing the central line as it is, at the time, the part of the victim D (Nam, 22 years old)'s eme gate part of the victim D (W) driving, which is proceeding from the north north side of the road at the time of the crossing, as it is, and damaged the property equivalent to KRW 1,304,60 for the replacement of the damaged vehicle's front gate due to the shock.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in court (the statement that the defendant was in excess of the median line);

1. A witness D's legal statement (a statement that collisions even if the defendant's horse cat has taken the batk by a sudden learning);

1. Legal statement of the witness F (a statement that the statement was made by the defendant beyond the median line)

1. The witness G's legal statement (a statement that the Defendant affixed a photograph over the median line on the ground of the trace of the surface of the road and the statement and report prepared by the Defendant and the victim at the time of the collision);

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs 2 and 4 (a defendant and his defense counsel denies negligence, but the defendant can be found to be negligent according to the evidence mentioned above) among each accident site photographs.

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting a crime;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (the punishment to be postponed: fine of KRW 500,000 per day; detention in a workhouse: KRW 100,000 per day; and circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing as set forth below) is the accused.