1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. During the disposition, the Plaintiff’s short-term visit of sojourn status (C-3) on February 8, 2014, the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “instant disposition”) of the date of application for refugee status recognition (C-3) on February 20, 2017: (a) the date of the application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) and the date of the decision on February 3, 2017; (b) there is no dispute over the rejection of the decision on March 14, 2017; (c) the fact that there is no ground for rejection of the decision on October 11, 2017 of the date of application for objection; (d) the statement in subparagraphs 1, 2, 1, and 2, and 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a national of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Pakic Republic”).

Although the Plaintiff was originally Muslim but entered the Republic of Korea, it was turned into the Republic of Korea, and if it returned to Pakistan, it is likely to threaten the Plaintiff’s family member or Islamic organization.

Therefore, the plaintiff should be recognized as a refugee.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines a refugee as “a foreigner who is unable to be protected or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion, or a foreigner who does not want to be protected, or who, due to such fear, cannot return to or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea.” In full view of the aforementioned evidence and the following circumstances revealed by adding the whole purport of the arguments in Articles 3 and 6 and 3 and 6, it is difficult to see that the Plaintiff “a well-founded fear on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion,” and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this, the Plaintiff’s application for refugee recognition was rejected.