Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On June 6, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million by the Seoul Western District Court as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

On August 12, 2019, around 22:12, the Defendant driven a BG4 U.S. car in the state of alcohol with the blood alcohol concentration of 0.094% 0.094% from the road in front of the water basin in Yangsan-si, the water basin in Yangsan-si to the land in the same city of nuclear power.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement statement and investigation report of the employer (the circumstantial report of the employer-employed driver);

1. Inquiry into the result of the crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports (verification of sound driving records), and copies of summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (Selection of Fine)

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (hereinafter referred to as “reasons for discretionary mitigation”), which is favorable to the defendant,

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although there was a record of being punished for drunk driving prior to the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, the fact that the driving of a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol and the quality of the crime is not good; the defendant's blood alcohol concentration level at the time is high; the defendant's responsibility for such crime is not less severe; in light of the frequency, contents, timing, etc. of the same criminal power, the possibility of criticism is not small; the defendant appears to be disadvantageous to the defendant; the risk of traffic accident is not realized due to this case; the occurrence of the crime does not realize the risk of traffic accident; and the same criminal power is included for more than seven years after June 2012, and there is no special criminal record.

The age, character and conduct, environment, status, and crime of the defendant.