A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 22, 2014, the Defendant: (a) had a beer in a singing practice room located in Kimhae-si B around 22:20 on November 22, 2014; (b) had received a report on the sale of alcoholic beverages in a singing practice room; and (c) had a police officer, who belongs to a D District, dispatched a defective beer, interfered with the removal of a beer, etc., to affix a field photograph; and (d) had come out of a singing practice room.

The Defendant returned to her flick, and assaulted the horse E, such as “I flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, flick, and flick, flick E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The crime of obstructing the performance of official duties by assaulting a police officer in the course of regulating the selling of alcoholic beverages by a singing practice room for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is not less severe than that of the defendant. The circumstances and result of the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered.