logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.05.25 2017고단939
상습사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] On November 1, 2011, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 500,000,000 as a penalty for fraud at the Incheon District Court; the summary order of KRW 700,000,000 as a penalty for fraud at the same court on March 10, 201; the summary order of KRW 1.5 million as a penalty for fraud at the same court on February 13, 2015; and the summary order of KRW 700,000 as a penalty for fraud at the same court on August 4, 2015; the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 4 million at the same court on December 22, 2016; on November 26, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a penalty of KRW 10,000,000 as a penalty for fraud; and on July 31, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On February 17, 2017, the Defendant habitually commits fraud: (a) enter the head office located in Seocheon-si C on February 17, 2017 as a customer; and (b) enter the said house as a customer.

As the food cost would be settled normally, the victim D, who is the owner of the place, ordered to provide alcohol and alcohol.

However, there was no valid means of payment such as cash or credit card during the process of receipt, and there was no intention or ability to settle the ordered food cost.

The Defendant received from the injured party a total of 22,00 won, such as chip and spawn, from the injured party.

In addition, from around that time to March 11, 2017, the Defendant received property by deceiving victims habitually over five times, such as the period in attached Table 1.

2. On January 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) entered a restaurant operated by the Victim F, F, in Bupyeong-si, 15:00 on a day-to-day basis; and (b) demanded the victim to pay the drinking value; and (c) made it difficult for the Defendant to avoid disturbance for about 40 minutes, including, but not limited to, a large amount of hydrogen, “Wee wres wres.”

In addition, from around that time to March 9, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the victims' work by force, such as avoiding disturbance from the victims' places of business eight times as shown in attached Table 2.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.F and G.

arrow