beta
Text
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiffs each amount of KRW 201,880,220 and each of the above amounts. From September 13, 2014 to July 6, 2018.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiffs are their successors as parents of the network D (hereinafter “the deceased”).
B. On September 13, 2014, around 12:10 on September 13, 2014, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the deceased, such as plastic contact with the deceased at a cafeteria E and 1st floor of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and the time the deceased was dead due to the stove site, etc., and caused the deceased to have his/her injury to the deceased due to the stoves of stoves at the stove site at the stoves room at the city of Ansan-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seocheon-gu, Incheon-gu, on September 12:17, 2014.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.
In relation to the instant accident, the Defendant was indicted on suspicion of injury or death to the Deceased and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six years at the court of first instance on February 6, 2015.
(Y) On July 16, 2015, the court of the second instance declared that the defendant's appeal was dismissed (Seoul High Court 2015No831), and the above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 5 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), purport of whole pleadings
2. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion was that the defendant committed a tort against the deceased and the plaintiffs through the accident of this case. Each of the plaintiffs is obligated to pay 22,185,474 won [178,367,38 won = passive damage 178,734,768 won + 1/2 of positive damage 2,400,000 won = 4,800 won [3,126,000 won for funeral expenses = 1,674,000 won for funeral expenses + 1/2 of the expenditure ratio] 50,000 won for consolation money - 8,581,910 won for victims of crime who received consolation money for victims of crime [17,163,820 won x 1/200] and delay damages.
3. Determination
A. According to the facts of recognition as above, the defendant intentionally injured the deceased and caused the death of the deceased, as a tortfeasor who caused the death of the deceased.