logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.07.19 2016구합67449
학교폭력징계조치처분취소
Text

1. All claims of Plaintiffs B, C, E, and F among the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The plaintiff A and D's claims are dismissed, respectively.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

Plaintiff

A and D are high school students attending the third grade of G High School in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff E and F are the parents of Plaintiff D.

Plaintiff

A, D, I, J, K, and L were enrolled in the second and second grades of G high schools around June 2016.

On June 28, 2016, K’s mother and L’s mother filed a school violence report (hereinafter “instant report”) with the content that “Plaintiff A, D, and L, together with I, J, and L L with L, expressed that “h’s bath and slandered L from the beginning of June 2016, and that K neglected or h’s bathed L from June 2016, and that K had L from June 2016 (hereinafter “instant report”).

(B) (No. 3) A. The Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence at G High Schools (hereinafter “instant autonomous committee”) held meetings of the 3rd autonomous committee (hereinafter “instant meeting”) on July 11, 2016, on the ground that “the Plaintiff A and D have inflicted psychological damage due to abusiveation and slander against the classed students” (hereinafter “instant meeting”) and resolved to grant the Defendant a written approval under Article 17(1)1, 2, and 3 of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against Violence at School (hereinafter “School Violence Prevention Act”), the prohibition of contact with the classed students, the number of special education under Article 17(3) of the same Act, the number of special education under Article 17(9) of the same Act, and the number of education under Article 17(3) of the same Act, and the number of special education under Article 17(3) of the same Act, with respect to the Plaintiff D and A’s guardians, to take four hours of special education under Article 17(9) of the same Act.

(A) Evidence No. 12, B No. 1). The Defendant notified the Plaintiffs of the instant resolution on July 14, 2016.

(B) Of the above notifications Nos. 2-1, 2, and 2, part against Plaintiff D and A with respect to “instant Disposition 1” and “instant Disposition 2”). 【Ground for Recognition” (Ground for Recognition 12, 12, 2-1, 2-2, 3-4, 3-4, respectively.

arrow