beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for one year, for Defendant B.
The Defendants filed a remedy order C.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant A 2018 Highest 3006 [Defendant A and B] committed as the head of the Korean branch office of an international financial investment advisory company, and the defendant B conspiredd to obtain money by deceiving the public interest corporation of the government office on the ground of the career of the Do Council members.
1. On April 2017, at the G-based office operated by Defendant A, located under the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building E E building F, the Defendants were to implement D Development Project together with H and the victim C at the G-based office operated by Defendant A, which is located under the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building F. The J gave investment consulting to the head of the Asia and the Korea branch, with a view to raising funds. The amount of investment is limited to a number of hundred millions. If the U.S. investment financing consulting conducted a project by attracting foreign capital due to the lack of funds, a large enterprise is actively sealed in the position of Pyeongtaek-si. Our and the implementing business entity will pay money to Korea. The Plaintiff must enter and confirm Pyeongtaek-si-si-related and the business entity should have to pay KRW 50 million,000,000,000,000,000 initial cost, such as air and lodging charges, and the need to pay KRW 50,500,000,000.”
However, in fact, the Defendants failed not only to raise funds of KRW 1.4 billion necessary for D development projects, which are public-private partnership projects, but also to receive D development projects, which are public-private partnership projects, from Pyeongtaek-si and I Corporation.
Defendants of the same year
4. 25. It was transferred from the victim to the one bank passbook in the name of the defendant under the name of the victim in the name of 20 million won under the pretext of investment necessary for aviation fees, lodging expenses, etc.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to attract the victim to receive the goods.
2. On June 29, 2017, the Defendants were the ices of the L Complex Development Project to H and the victim C, who tried to resist D development project in the G office of the said limited liability company.