Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 4, 2019, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) around 22:05, the Defendant boarded a taxi operated by the victim B on the street in front of the Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Enterprise Bank; (b) moved the taxi to the front of the building, and did not pay KRW 41,000,000 without justifiable grounds.

2. On December 5, 2019, around 00:02, the Defendant reported 112 in front of the building, the victim E, a police officer belonging to the Incheon Southern Police Station D District, who called the Incheon Southern Police Station, recommended the Defendant to return home, and the victim E, who was a police officer belonging to the Incheon Southern Police Station, expressed a large amount of alcohol, “Chewing, Chewing,” and assaulted the victim’s chest part by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and the maintenance of order by the victim, who is a police officer, and openly insultd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement prepared B;

1. Application of laws and subordinate statutes (Evidence Nos. 8) to Bag video CDs (Evidence List)

1. Relevant provisions of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, Article 3 (1) 39 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the occupation of a person without fault), Articles 136 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (to the extent that the maximum amount of the fine for each crime is aggregated);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant did not pay the taxi fee in the state of detention, and the offense is not good in that he exercised violence against the police officer dispatched for this reason and took a bath.

However, the defendant seems to have an attitude to reflect the wrong when he substituted for the crime, and is the first offender who has no criminal history, and is on the day of the crime.