logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.04.28 2016고정592
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 10:20 on August 23, 2016, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E (the victim E (the 59-year old) who is a son of the Defendant's pro-friendly interest D, and suffered the Defendant's math, and used the victim as a plastic son by assaulting the Defendant's math, etc. as a matter of delay in construction work entrusted by the Defendant at the construction site of the Gangwon-do Incheon-do Incheon-gun Cpent Corporation, which was constructed at the construction site of the new site on August 23, 2016. The Defendant used the victim's her her her her her her her her her her her herth herth herth herth herth herth herth herth herth herst herth herth herth herth herst herth herth herst herst her second herst her second her

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of E;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as records of outpatient treatment and certificates of diagnosis of injury (E);

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The gist of the claim is that the defendant, on the ground of plastic chairs, did not display the victim towards the victim, or spawn him/her in drinking; however, he/she was unilaterally assaulted by the injured person, and during that process, he/she only saw the victim’s breath at the defensive vehicle.

The argument is asserted.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence of each judgment, i.e., ① the victim made a statement, contrary to the victim’s statement in this court, against the victim’s son who flaps and bucks, etc., in an investigative agency, but the victim abused flabs with the Defendant and the Defendant, etc. up to the time of this court until the investigation agency and this court, and at the time, the Defendant committed an act of flabing with each other.

consistently stated.

arrow