logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.09.25 2012고정5863
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has operated Taekwondo seals in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, 201.

On July 18, 2012, around 15:30 on July 18, 2012, the Defendant, at the management office of the first floor underground of the above C building, assaulted the victim by breaking d (ma, 65 years of age) and the management expenses settlement.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on witness E’s legal statement;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Subdivision of crimes under Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act with respect to detention in a workhouse;

1. On July 18, 2012, the Defendant, at around 15:30 on July 18, 2012, at the first floor management office of the above C building, disputes over the problem of the victim D (ma, 65 years of age) and the settlement of management expenses, which is the chief of the management office, and the victim’s flab, spathed with flab, and laid down plastic chairs at the bottom and laid down the victim’s flab, thereby gathering about about 14 days of treatment.

2. At the time of the instant case, the Defendant and his defense counsel had no physical contact with the victim, such as breath, etc., and did not gather the chair on the floor.

3. As evidence consistent with the facts charged, there are statements of D in this Court and the police, statements E (12 pages of investigation records), injury diagnosis statements, victim's hospital medical fees, etc.

First of all, D stated in this law or the police that the defendant was sealed on the wall by putting him flab and had a flabed with his chest by drinking, and had a flabed with the flab, and had a flabed with the flab and had a flab, prevented him from sping.

However, witness E, in this court, ① although the defendant was aware of the body and flabed with D with D, D was not the upper body of D, E was removed from the office immediately, and the defendant was not the time when D was flabed, ② the defendant was flabed with D, ② the defendant was flab with plastic chairs on the floor.

arrow