1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: “28 February 28, 2013,” “2013,” “1,810 households,” “all 1,810 households,” and “A” under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, the part pertaining to “a 1,810,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,000,000,000,00,000,000,00

1) The plaintiff's assertion that the judgment on the plaintiff's assertion is as follows: ① E 101, ② 112 and 403, ③ 109 and 2301 G, ④ 110 Dong 2203, ⑤ 107 Dong 1603, ④ 101 Dong 1304 J, 115 Dong 802 K, 105 Dong 1801 L, 1602 M, 104 Dong 1602 N, 104 Dong 1602 N, 104 Dong 2303 N, 102 Dong 2202, 104 Dong 2031 and 204 Dong Dong 201, 305 Dong 131, 405 Dong Dong 141, 204, and 305 Dong Dong 141, 204 others.

As seen above, the dissenting opinions of heading 902, Y, 111, 2303, and Z, 2203 AA, 2204, 2103, AB, 111, 111, and 404, such as AE, 111, 111, and 1801, AF, such as AF, of the same 902, Y, 111, and 1802, cannot be deemed to have been prepared based on the actual intent of the resident. Therefore, as long as the occupants, etc. who have expressed their dissenting opinions to a private contract do not reach 181 households, which are 1/10 of all households, pursuant to the relevant statutes and the instant management rules, they met the requirements for preventing the conclusion of a contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.