logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.03.19 2014고합933
변호사법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around January 2001, the Defendant retired from the Grade 6 tax official of the Namyang-si Tax Office, and thereafter is a representative certified tax accountant of H in the Guri-si Tax Accounting Corporation located in Guri-si from that time.

Around January 2010, the Defendant listened to the fact that J, a branch of the Defendant’s CJ, would be subject to the collection of capital gains tax from KP, and around that time, the Defendant met J along with I at the multilateral near K, and “I had a tax official living before home. So, there is a lot of employees of the tax office and is well known and well known to the K superintendent of the tax office. I want to proceed with this time. I will present a document to J. M because I provided a frier to LP M. because it has been a tax unit, it will proceed through the work through staff from the tax unit in the transfer tax division, and it would be possible for the public official in charge of capital gains tax and the staff in charge of capital gains tax to submit the related documents to the said M.

In that sense, the Defendant, through I, sent the horses to the J, that “the level of KRW 100 million is necessary to resolve the problem”, and received money from the relevant public officials under the pretext of allowing the J to reduce capital gains tax by paying expenses to him/her at the O hotel coffee shop located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Seoul, on February 2, 2010, while the J “I have been prepared at one hundred million won at once, and fifty million won in cash.”

Accordingly, the defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting cases or affairs handled by public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to the Prosecutor's Office;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a bankbook submitted by the J and a copy of the slips withdrawn in cash by the J in the amount of KRW 50 million;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow