beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. B completed the registration of destruction and recovery in its name on June 27, 1957 with respect to the land of Gangwon-do Steelwon-gun C (hereinafter “B before subdivision”).
B. B died on July 25, 1959, and the Plaintiff is the sole heir of the deceased B.
C. On October 14, 2010, land before subdivision was divided into C, D, and E, and land before subdivision was divided into land on October 14, 2010, G land as real estate listed in Appendix 1 List 1, D land on September 23, 2008, H land on H land, I land on September 23, 2008, real estate listed in Appendix 1 List 2, J land on October 14, 201, and E land on October 14, 2010 was subdivided into land of K, which is real estate listed in Appendix 1 List 3.
Part C of the G’s land is 850 square meters in order to connect each point of the attached Table 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 25, 24, 23, 23, 23, 25, 11, 12, 13, 14, 22, 21, 21, 20, 20, 20, 19, 18, and 3 of the land in the annexed Table 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 25, 24, 24, 25, 25, 11, 12, 13, 14, 222, 20, 209 square meters in the attached Table 3, 3,3, 18, 19, 200, 216, 17.
E. Meanwhile, on September 22, 197, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Central Farmland Improvement Association, the name of the Defendant’s change, on the ground of land expropriation as of May 9, 1977, on the land before subdivision.
(B) On December 23, 2009, the registration of change of indication has been made under the name of the defendant). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2-1 through 4, Gap evidence 2-1 through 3, Gap evidence 4, and 5-1, 2, and 3, respectively, and the result of this court's request for surveying and appraisal for the steel branch office of the Korea Land Information Corporation, the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole.
2. The plaintiff's assertion
A. The land before subdivision was owned by the network B. The Defendant expropriated the land before subdivision without following lawful expropriation procedures, such as payment of compensation for the land before subdivision to the network B and the Plaintiff.