logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.06.19 2015나30
회생담보권조사확정재판에 대한 이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning of the court's reasoning on this case is as follows: ① adding "Dong C Cement Co., Ltd." (hereinafter "Dongyang C") to the 8th sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, ② appeal by C, etc. against the 11th sentence after the 15th sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance. The appellate court acquitted some victims of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) and fraud on May 22, 2015, reversed C's conviction portion among the judgment of the court of first instance and sentenced C in seven years. However, as seen above, it convicted them as to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Misappropriation) (Seoul High Court 2014No3294). This appeal by C, etc. with respect to this case, and accepted it as it is based on the main sentence of Article 201 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the case being added to Supreme Court Decision 2015Do8191.

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow