1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On June 19, 2015, the Plaintiff was employed as a one-time worker at the construction site of the parking lot B at the construction site of the same day, and the Plaintiff was faced with an accident in which the fee workers shock the Plaintiff’s timber and shoulder (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) on the wind that the fee workers set up the board, while carrying the fee workers and the panel on the truck at the construction site of the parking lot B.

The Plaintiff was diagnosed “No. 5-6” due to the instant accident (hereinafter “instant injury”) and applied for medical care benefits for the instant injury and disease to the Defendant on September 16, 2015.

The defendant first issued an approval for non-approval for the medical care, but the defendant revoked the existing non-approval and approved the medical care through the administrative litigation filed by the plaintiff.

Accordingly, the plaintiff has been continuously receiving medical care.

With respect to the medical treatment plan submitted by the Plaintiff to the Defendant on July 22, 2016 (the treatment plan from August 1, 2016 to August 14, 2016), the Defendant approved the treatment period on August 4, 2016, and notified the Plaintiff that he/she would wish to terminate the treatment after the treatment for the said period.

On September 12, 2016, the Plaintiff submitted a treatment plan for three weeks (hereinafter referred to as “instant treatment plan period”) from August 15, 2016 to September 4, 2016, along with the opinion of the rule of view that a continuous physical treatment is required, to the Defendant for a continuous appeal for pain, and that the treatment needs to be provided.

On September 21, 2016, the Defendant, upon receipt of the medical treatment plan as of July 22, 2016, notified the Plaintiff of the result of deliberation that it is reasonable to terminate the medical treatment by fixing the symptoms after the medical treatment from the advisory society held on August 3, 2016 to August 14, 2016, and the Plaintiff was already notified on August 4, 2016, and on the ground that the above medical treatment plan is appropriate to terminate after the medical treatment was completed on August 14, 2016, because the above medical treatment plan is not approved.