1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On October 29, 2001, the plaintiff was employed as a street cleaners by entering the company in charge of a large-scale project.

On September 23, 2013, there was an accident that does not seem to be shocked on the road surface from the cleaning work vehicle in motion.

As a result, the Plaintiff was subject to the diagnosis of the “integrative Egrative Egropical Egropical Egropical Egropical Egrops in the Republic of Korea” (hereinafter referred to as the “existing Egropic Egrops”).

The Plaintiff received medical care benefits by July 31, 2015 according to the approval of the medical care, and the medical care was terminated thereafter.

During the medical treatment of the previous injury and disease of this case, the Plaintiff received a diagnosis of “the Alley Madratitis on the left-hand slatosis” (hereinafter “the additional injury and disease of this case”) and applied for an additional injury and disease to the Defendant.

On April 2, 2015, the Defendant decided not to approve additional injury and disease, but revoked the non-approval disposition on August 16, 2016 according to the recommendation of mediation in the administrative litigation filed by the Plaintiff and approved medical care for each additional injury and disease in the instant case.

Upon the approval of medical care for each of the instant additional injury and disease, the Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant a medical care plan for the relevant additional injury and disease from February 25, 2015 to September 30, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for medical care due to each of the instant additional injury and disease from October 1, 2016 to November 30, 2016, stating that “The instant additional injury and disease requires hospital treatment,” from October 1, 2016 to November 30, 2016, “the instant additional injury and disease need hospital treatment.” On the same day, the Plaintiff filed a claim for medical care due to each of the instant additional injury and disease from August 1, 2015 to August 24, 2016.

In addition, on September 6, 2016, a claim for temporary layoff benefits was made during the period from August 1, 2015 to August 31, 2016, which was unemployed.

On September 7, 2016, the defendant submitted the plaintiff's medical treatment plan to the plaintiff on September 7, 2016 and the period after July 31, 2015, which is the closing date of each of the additional medical care in this case approved, requires additional medical care.