logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.09.19 2018고단2515
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 27, 2015, the Defendant against the Victim B, at the D office where the Defendant works for the Defendant in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, Busan-do, and the fact was transferred 40 million won to the E account (F) in the name of the Defendant, on the following grounds: (a) even if the previous obligation was less than 40 million won and even if the Defendant did not engage in an old housing remodeling project, he did not have the intent or ability to pay 20% of the principal amount as profit even if he did not receive an investment from another person; (b) the victim B who was working together with the victim B who purchased a old house and subsequently sold it again after remodeling; and (c) upon making an investment, 20% of the principal amount and the principal amount are to be repaid together after six months.

Around March 18, 2016, the Defendant continued to receive 20 million won from the injured party to the above account by stating that “If the Defendant is under repair of another house, and the funds for the business are additionally lent 20 million won, 20% of the principal and principal shall be repaid together,” and that he/she received money from the injured party to the above account.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On January 19, 2017, the Defendant against the victim G was not aware of the intent or ability to pay 20% of the principal to the investor as profit even if he/she did not engage in an old housing remodeling project because he/she had an existing obligation of KRW 120 million and did not engage in an old housing remodeling project, but did not have an intent or ability to pay 20% of the principal to the investor as profit. The victim G, who was aware of his/her knowledge, shows the scene of the work located in the Geum-gu in Busan, and operates a business again after purchasing an old house and then selling it again after remodeling, and if he/she made an investment, he/she received 20% of the principal and principal as profit after 6 months from the damaged person’s account under the name of the Defendant E account.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

3. The criminal defendant against the victim I is guilty at the place described in paragraph 1 around June 2017, and the existing obligation is 100 million won.

arrow