logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.29 2014나46708
건물명도 등
Text

1. The judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded in the trial, shall be modified as follows:

The defendant.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is about the 6, 7th of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2)(b)The part of paragraph (b) is amended as follows, and except for the addition of “the details of attempted rent, etc.” after the 11th “the details of the attempted rent, etc.,” as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance except for the addition of “the details of the additional attempted rent, etc.”, this shall be cited as it is

[B] Furthermore, comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the amount of overdue rent, etc. that the Defendant is obliged to pay to the Plaintiff, the Defendant’s monthly amount of KRW 17.6 million (1.6 million), management fee of KRW 2.2 million (2 million, value added tax of KRW 2.6 million), and KRW 3 million (2.6 million, value added tax of KRW 2.3 million), the Plaintiff’s principal and value added tax of KRW 4.3 billion, and the Defendant’s delayed payment damages of KRW 2.19 billion to KRW 309,000,000, KRW 209,000,000, KRW 2.309,000,000, KRW 209,000,000, KRW 309,000,000, KRW 309,000,000,000, KRW 29,000,00,000).

arrow