logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.01.12 2015고합20
공인중개사의업무및부동산거래신고에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 7,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 3 years for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant B, “2015 Gohap20,” was awarded a successful bid for all 204, 206, and 3-5 stories of the second floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the Magnam-si I Commercial Building in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, and Defendant A is a brokerage assistant belonging to the K-Agrae-si Jin-si.

1. Defendant B’s violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) of the Specific Economic Crimes (based on March 9, 2013, the Defendant agreed to lease all the above 2-5th floor between the victim and the victim’s office to the New Year’s New Year’s New Year’s Office L in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-si, to the effect that “I shop tenants rent all the 2-5th floor and move out of the 5th floor, and the Defendant purchased it or obtained the owner’s consent and resolve all the auction problems,” and the victim and the victim agreed to lease all the 2-5th floor from March 29, 2013 to seven years from March 29, 2013 to receive KRW 150 million as the down payment from the damaged party, and additionally received the remainder of KRW 500,000 from the injured party on March 25, 2013.

However, as to the above 204, 206, and 3-5 floors owned by the Defendant at the time, around February 2008, the Plaintiff received one billion won deposit from P which became the tenant of the above building on or around July 24, 2008, and the right to request the transfer of ownership was registered to P as of July 24, 2008. The three auction procedures were jointly conducted from November 27, 2009 to August 27, 2010, upon the request of Q, P, and Korea bank, from the time of the commencement of the auction. Since R from July 2009 to July 27, 2009, the Plaintiff exercised the above 34-4-44 of the commercial building on or around July 34, 2000 to the Defendant on the basis of the right to request the transfer of ownership and the right to request the transfer of ownership was decided as to the above 300 million construction price.

arrow