logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.04.25 2018나10150
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. Pursuant to the conjunctive claim added by this court, the defendant 37,30.

Reasons

In light of the above legal principles, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 5% per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act until April 25, 2019, which is the date of this decision, which is the date of this decision, and at the rate of 15% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to the date of full payment.

[표 1] (단위: 원) 수입금액 소득금액 소득세 2004년 귀속 85,852,000 5,896,000 812,000 2005년 귀속 405,313,000 33,148,000 2,805,000 2006년 귀속 746,172,000 78,568,000 13,323,000 2007년 귀속 650,553,000 65,705,000 13,526,000 2008년 귀속 334,191,000 30,584,000 4,775,000 합계 2,222,081,000 213,901,000 35,241,000 수입금액 및 소득금액: F점에 대한 자료 소득세: 모든 소득에 대한 종합소득세 결정세액 [표 2] (단위: 원) 수입금액 소득금액 피고 급여 조합수익 소득세 정산기준액 2004년 귀속* 85,852,000 5,896,000 8,000,000** -2,104,000 812,000 -2,916,000 2005년 귀속 405,313,000 33,148,000 24,000,000*** 9,148,000 2,805,000 6,343,000 2006년 귀속 746,172,000 78,568,000 24,000,000 54,568,000 13,323,000 41,245,000 2007년 귀속 650,553,000 65,705,000 24,000,000 41,705,000 13,526,000 28,179,000 2008년 귀속 334,191,000 30,584,000 24,000,000 6,584,000 4,775,000 1,809,000 합계 2,222,081,000 213,901,000 104,000,000 109,901,000 35,241,000 74,660,000 * 2004. 9. ~2004. 12. ** 월 2,000,000 × 4개월 *** 월 2,000,000 × 12개월, 이하 같다.

Paragraph 3 is replaced by the following contents among the reasons for the judgment of the first instance.

3. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. As to the assertion, since the defendant has settled the profits during the period of the business with the plaintiff each month, no longer the amount to be paid remains, and even if the amount to be paid remains, the amount to be paid is remaining.

This asserts that the five-year extinctive prescription as a commercial bond has expired.

B. We examine the judgment, and the entries of the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 in the evidence Nos. 1-1 and 2 are in the period of the original and the Defendant’s partnership.

arrow