beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Fraud;
A. The Defendant’s fraud against students is the president of “BA”.
In fact, from May 2010, the Defendant was in a state of hostileizing the students of “BAD” operated by the Defendant, and even if the Defendant received money from the victims who were students under the name of deposit in the amount equivalent to KRW 50 million without any special property or income, he/she did not have any intention or ability to return it after five months.
Nevertheless, on September 10, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D, who was enrolled in the above “B private teaching institute” located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, stating that “if a private teaching institute is enrolled in the school for five months, the employment company will be connected later, and if 50,000 won is required to be paid, 50,000 won is to be returned after five months.” The Defendant received KRW 500,000 from the victim E for the deposits in the private teaching institute from the victim and received KRW 500,000 from the victim E in the same manner and received KRW 50,000 from the victim F on October 1, 201 of the same year, KRW 50,000 from the victim G on the same day, KRW 50,000 from the victim H on the same day, and KRW 500,000 from the victim I on the same day, respectively.
Accordingly, the Defendant was granted KRW 3 million in total as deposit fees for private teaching institutes by deceiving six victims as above.
B. On June 2010, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the business owner, who had been subscribed to the fourth insurance in the Daejeon Regional Labor Office, had the State-funded subsidy, and the employee’s education subsidy, to receive vocational skills development training expenses and the employee’s education subsidy by deceiving the staff of the Daejeon Regional Labor Office, and the fact that the Defendant was willing to take part in the “B Private Institutes” operated by the Defendant.