A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 00:43 on August 15, 2016, at the residence of the Defendant, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) around 00:43, at the time of port, the Defendant, who was requested by the police officer to take a drinking test from the police officer D, the police officer belonging to the coastwise, the police officer, and the E police officer, who was called out after having been reported 112 that the Defendant driven under the influence of alcohol; (b) d, the police officer, and the police officer, who was demanded to take a drinking test; (c) d, d, e.g., taking the drinking measuring instrument cited by the police officer D to take a bath

The Defendant continued to commit a crime with E’s cellular phone, and assaulted the Defendant, such as scambling his or her luminous ray, scambling his or her luminous ray, and walking the back of the back of the back of the back of the back of the front.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (a copy of sound recording reports and photographs, etc. on the upper part of the police officers called out);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, including the fact that the defendant is in confession and reflects his mistake

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;