logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.09.21 2017고단2964
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 15:00 on April 17, 2017, the Defendant would offer the “D” camera located on the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 1st floor, and the “E”, a smartphone-type f (n, 17 years of age) and KRW 100,000 on two occasions in gender relations.

Unlike reporting Lone Star, from the 17:00 to the 17:00, a juvenile F dialogueed to the effect that he was “I” before G hospital and had the juvenile F go to the “Iel” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H until 17:00 on the same day.

In this way, the defendant recommended the juvenile to sell sex to the juvenile for the purpose of morale of the juvenile.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A statement of F and J;

1. Details of conversations with K hosting;

1. Evidentiary photographs;

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. Relevant Article 13 of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and Article 13 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (excluding punishment);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 21 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, the Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that there was no “act of soliciting to sell sex” after the Defendant became aware that the other party was a juvenile.

According to the above evidence, the Defendant, even after clearly recognizing that the F was a juvenile, requested F to verify whether F had a person who had been engaged in F with F while continuing to do so, and whether F had a person who had been engaged in her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her

Although the Defendant talked about F and sexual traffic methods and considerations, the Defendant continued to commit the above acts even though F and F became a juvenile in the process, and the Defendant’s series of such acts constitute soliciting a child to sell sex to the juvenile.

Therefore, the defendant and the defense counsel are not accepted.

arrow