The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On January 24, 2017, the Defendant was unfairly treated by the Defendant’s house located in the Defendant’s house located in C at the time of smuggling around January 24, 2017 from the victim C’s Kamera store operated by the victim C.

I think that the defendant's personal data program is very very very difficult to say that the defendant's personal data program is ‘D'.

b. Then, I written a writing that “I will live in this life if I would like to consider this satisfy,” which read “I will do so. I will do so.”

Defendant 1 puts on the comments, “I wish to see only Lone Star’s Loneone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s Lone’s.”

2. Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act; Article 312 subparag. 1 of the Criminal Act (Revocation of a complaint filed by a victim after the institution of public prosecution in this case)