(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.03.18 2014고단2034

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.03.18 2014고단2034

강제추행등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 21, 2014, the Defendant committed indecent act by compulsion: (a) around October 21, 2014, the Defendant: (b) committed indecent act by compulsion; (c) committed indecent act by compulsion on the part of the victim E, who was on the part of the victim E, who was on the part of the D cafeteria located in the Doncheon-gun, Nanju-gun; (d) committed an indecent act against the victim on the part of the victim, by viewing the victim E, along with Nan F; and (e) committing an indecent act against the victim on the part of his/her hand.

2. The Defendant committed indecent act by compulsion at the time and place mentioned in the preceding paragraph.

The victim F, who is the victim of the above E, (“F, 59 years of age, 59 years of age, she did not see where she sets his/her hand, and where she does not have any other place, she did so.” The victim she took a bath at the victim’s hand, and she blicked the victim’s blick with his/her hand floor, and she blicked the victim’s blicks and flicks that go beyond the ground surface, and she flicked the victim’s blick and flicks that go beyond the ground surface.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Each statement of witness E, F and G in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Some of the statements made by the prosecution against the accused in the examination protocol of suspect;

1. Determination of the defendant's assertion of each police statement about witness E, F, and G

1. The gist of the defendant's assertion is that the victim E, who was scam from the following, was scamd with the victim E, but did not have been scamd with the victim, such as following the victim, and did not take charge of the victim's scambling with both sides, and did not assault the victim by taking scamd with the victim's scamscam and scamd with the victim's scams at one time. The defendant only scamd with the victim's scamscams at one time.

2. The victims and G’s respective statements are specific, consistent and difficult to find contradictions between their respective statements, and they are difficult to find motives or reasons to make unfavorable statements to the Defendant.

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 2015.06.05 2015노312

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.08.14 2019고단2044

-광주지방법원 2015.02.04 2014고단4392

-대구지방법원 2015.12.18 2015고합387

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.08.22 2014고합140