beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 236,680,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from August 5, 2017 to October 12, 2018.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) A Licensed Real Estate Agent C is the D Licensed Real Estate Agent Office established and registered by himself/herself (hereinafter “instant Licensed Real Estate Agent Office”).
(2) From July 2010 to July 2016, E lent the qualification certificate of licensed real estate agents from around July 2010 to around July 2016, E had them act as a broker in the name of C while operating the above authorized brokerage office. 2) The Plaintiff, as the owner of “G”, which is a multi-family house with the third floor above the F of Michuhol-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant real estate”), delegated the conclusion of a monthly rent contract with KRW 1 million to KRW 2,00,000 or KRW 2,50,000 or KRW 3,200,000,000,000,000 or KRW 2,000,000,000,000 or KRW 2,000,000,000,00
3) The Defendant is a mutual aid agreement between a licensed real estate agent C and a licensed real estate agent C for each year from January 12, 2013 to January 11, 2017, where C is liable to compensate for damage caused property damage to a transaction party by intention or negligence by causing property damage to the transaction party, the Defendant is liable to compensate for such damage within the limit of the amount of the mutual aid agreement (hereinafter “instant mutual aid agreement”).
(B) E is a mutual aid project operator who entered into a contract. (b) E is a mutual aid project operator who entered into a contract with the Plaintiff on behalf of the Plaintiff for a monthly rent contract, even though only the authority to conclude the monthly rent contract was granted by the Plaintiff on behalf of the Plaintiff on each of the subparagraphs listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 list, and received deposits from the above lessee, beyond the scope of the delegation.
2 E, around 2009, was not authorized by the Plaintiff to enter into a lease agreement with the Plaintiff as to each subparagraph and sub-lease as stated in the separate sheet No. 2 list, and was not authorized by the Plaintiff on behalf of the Plaintiff to enter into an obligatory lease agreement on behalf of the Plaintiff.