1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6,00,000 won;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

On July 7, 2017, at around 00:05, the Defendant received 112 reports to the effect that “A vehicle is suspected of driving drinking” on the road located in Pyeongtaek-si C, and requested the Defendant to present his/her identification card to the police officer assigned to the Pyeongtaek-si Police Station E box called to the site, which is suspected of driving drinking. The Defendant did not drive a vehicle to show why he/she would have to do so. The Defendant does not have to drive it, and one governance Rose is designated.

“At the end,” the F’s dog is drawn in hand, and the F’s check part of the F’s uniform name is kept in hand.

Accordingly, F arrested the Defendant as a current offender who interfered with the performance of official duties, and the Defendant “F” means “W, by unfringing the wall, hackers, sok kb kbs.

“In the face of the victim’s left arms with his hand, the victim’s injury was inflicted upon the victim, who was quih to get about 10 days of medical treatment, such as the multi-satis of the following arms, which requires medical treatment.

As a result, the Defendant assaulted police officers F, thereby obstructing his legitimate execution of duties on the handling of reported case 112, and at the same time injured the victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each statement of G and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishments imposed on the crimes of serious injury).

3. Selection of an alternative fine;

4. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

5. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant was in a state of mental or physical loss or mental weakness due to mental illness at the time of committing the crime of this case. Thus, according to the records of this case, the defendant was above.