A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 1338] The Defendant on January 6, 2010 to the victim F, who is the owner of coastal fishing E(9.77 tons) in the D Job Referral located in Mapopo-si on January 6, 2010, is on board as the crew of the said fishing vessel from the first patrol officer of February 2010 to December 31 of the said year.

“The purport was to the effect that “.....”

However, the defendant did not intend to board the above fishing vessel, and was thought to have received the money from the above fishing vessel and used it as living expenses.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 25 million won from the victim, namely, in advance, from the victim.

[2016 order 1838]

1. On March 2, 2010, the Defendant was on the part of March 2, 2010, on the part of the Defendant, on the part of the victim I, the owner of the fishing vessel H located in the Gunsan-si G, G, as the victim’s crew member from March 3, 2010 to May 2, 2010.

“The purport was to the effect that “.....”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to work as a seafarer after boarding the above fishing vessel only when he was able to flee with down payment.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 500,000 won from the victim, namely, the down payment.

2. On March 7, 2010, the Defendant, on March 7, 2010, committed fraud, to the victim I, “I will be subject to an investigation at the Bapo Coast Coastal Police Station.”

The reason was that “the tea subsidization was changed.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not intend to return to the victim and work as a seafarer because he did not think that he would escape after receiving the down payment.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 300,000 won from the victim, namely, the victim.

3. On March 8, 2010, the Defendant was sent one million won by phone to the victim I on March 8, 2010, and “A fine to be paid is not returned to the victim I. However, the Defendant was sent one million won.”

State shall pay and return a fine.

“The purport was to the effect that “.....”

However, the defendant is true.